|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Frequently
Asked Questions |
 |
 |
|  2
- Total claims to have eradicated forced labor in the Yadana pipeline corridor. Could you be more specific?
There is obviously no forced labor related to Yadana activities. All TEPM activities are conducted in strict compliance with TEPM Ethics Charter, which is widely distributed and well known by our employees, contractors and partners and which clearly states that: "Total E&P Myanmar ensures that its personnel policies and operational practices prohibit and prevent forced or compulsory labor, discrimination and child labor and more generally respect the internationally recognized labor standards. Total E&P Myanmar provides workers with fair remuneration and equitable treatment in accordance with the relevant labor market".
Outside the scope of Yadana operations, TEPM has established a procedure ensuring a formal and systematic follow-up of any potential issue arising in the pipeline area. If TEPM teams receive any information about a potential issue, TEPM will investigate the case and verify the information. If the allegations are substantiated and prove not to be in line with our Code of Conduct, TEPM will bring the case to MOGE and/or the Ministry of Energy and ask them to take the necessary actions. All actions will be discussed at least weekly until the case is closed.
|
|
| |
 |
|  3
- What role did the Myanmar Army play during construction
of the pipeline?
In general, a country’s government is responsible
for maintaining law and order.
In this case, the Army began operating in the pipeline
region around 1988, well before Total arrived in Myanmar,
at a time when the new government stepped up efforts
against rebels in different parts of the country. The
Army’s activity was entirely unrelated to the
project. The military’s presence was strengthened
following a March 1995 ambush of a truck working on
the project, an attack that killed five people.
The Army was not present on the worksite, where security
was managed by Total and its subcontractors, but troops
were operating in the general area to keep guerillas
from getting close to the site. Via MOGE, the state-owned
oil and gas company, Total was required to keep the
Army regularly informed of how work was progressing
and where teams were operating. However, we have never
had a contractual relationship with the Army, given
it instructions, or paid it any money.
To ensure the safety of project personnel and comply with
its long-standing practices, Total took defensive measures
that it felt were both normal and necessary, such as introducing
security teams, ID badges, protective enclosures, radio
check-ins, and rules covering movement and access.
Aware of the risk that the Army might requisition villagers
for forced labor, we provided effective protection for inhabitants:
 |
 |
 |
 |
- |
Early in the project, communication
channels were established with villagers through
Village
Communication Committees, communication officers,
physicians and agriculturalists living in the
villages, and villagers
hired by contract to work on the project. In this
way, our teams knew immediately what was happening
in
the
field and
were able to intercede in cases of abuse. |
 |
- |
From the beginning, Total made it very
clear to government officials that forced labor was
unacceptable and ensured that the Army did not resort
to this practice in the pipeline region. |
|
|
| |
 |
|  4
- Did the pipeline project cause villagers to be relocated?
No one in the pipeline region has been relocated since
Total’s arrival. Long before the pipeline project
was first considered, one village was relocated, in an unrelated
development that most likely occurred in 1991 or 1992. In
one of the initiatives undertaken as part of the Socio-Economic
Program, Total arranged for any of these displaced villagers
who so desired to return to their former homes in 1997.
Generally speaking, it is inaccurate to say that the Army
“secured” the region before Total arrived.
Population in the pipeline region has grown from 35,000
when construction began to over 50,000 in 2006. This increase
contrasts with the situation in most other rural areas of
Myanmar, where people have tended to migrate to the country’s
major cities or to Thailand. It also attests to the good
living conditions in the pipeline region and to the Yadana
project’s contribution to developing the local economy. |
|
| |
 |
|  6
- How do the villagers feel about Total’s presence?
The trusting relationships developed with the inhabitants
of the 25 villages in the pipeline region constitute our
most effective response to critics. This trust was created
through the close contacts forged with villagers since early
1995 by our Socio-Economic Program teams, as they met with
inhabitants and explained the Yadana project. As they deepened
their understanding of local needs, the teams have helped
villagers to implement their own projects, defended villager
interests and ensured their safety. From the beginning,
these relationships have been nurtured by the project’s
Myanmar employees—the physicians, veterinarians, agriculturalists
and communication officers who live in the villages, side
by side with inhabitants, who can discuss their concerns
openly, without intermediaries or fear of reprisal.
We made sure that the pipeline project has inconvenienced
people as little as possible. Its route was chosen to avoid
villages and compensation was paid to farmers temporarily
or permanently prevented from using some of their land.
Roughly one-third of construction workers were hired locally,
with jobs fairly distributed among the villages.
Outside observers—members of the Collaborative for
Development Action (CDA) in particular, but also journalists,
diplomats and representatives of NGOs—have visited
the site and noted that villagers are satisfied with Total’s
presence and with the Socio-Economic Program implemented
for them. |
|
| |
 |
|  7
- Why has Total stayed in Myanmar while many other Western
companies have left?
A number of Western companies, particularly from the United
States, have left Myanmar for various reasons, although
all have been subject to pressure from activist organizations.
Total has stayed because we feel that, independently of
the pipeline project, our presence is beneficial for the
country and that pulling out would create a number of problems
for the Myanmar people without offering the slightest advantage.
In fact, the country derives a great deal of benefit from
having the Yadana project managed by a socially responsible
company.
 |
 |
 |
 |
- |
Employment conditions. All employees
receive higher-than-average wages for the country and
are protected by a social safety net. What’s more,
the terms of their work contracts, which comply with
Total standards, may have a spillover effect on local
legislation. The stringent requirements placed on local
subcontractors (work contracts, health and safety guidelines,
minimum wages, etc.) are having a similar impact. |
 |
- |
Economic benefits. A number of subcontractors
with whom the Group has forged regular, cooperative
relationships have been able to expand and improve their
technical skills. The project has also created a range
of job opportunities and markets for nearby communities. |
 |
- |
Training. During the construction
period, nearly 2,000 people were trained in a
variety of trades
and assigned to technical positions. A US$10-million
training program provided more than 100 skilled
technicians
and managers with the advanced expertise they needed
to manage the operating facilities. |
 |
- |
The Socio-Economic Program. Thanks
to this program, some 50,000 people are now healthier
and
better educated, earning higher wages, and, most
importantly, living in a secure environment. |
 |
- |
Socio-political benefits. Other significant
contributions include the creation of a civil society
in the 25 villages located in the pipeline region
and the elimination of forced labor in those villages
through ongoing constructive dialogue with government
authorities. |
We feel that withdrawing from a country with serious problems
is hardly the best way to help it resolve those problems. |
|
| |
 |
|  8
- Total supports the UN Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights. Doesn't this support conflict with your presence in Myanmar?
Total's presence in Myanmar does not conflict with the spirit of the Norms, which recognize the significant influence companies can have on people and communities in their host regions. We're fully aware of the role we have to play. In this framework, we strive to uphold personal rightss in our host region, where our social and educational projects, deployed since 1995, have had acknowledged benefits. The economic development of a country, even one that is not a democracy, is a fundamental cornerstone of the development of human rights.
|
|
| |
 |
|  9
- Is the Socio-Economic Program scaled to meet Myanmar’s
problems?
From 1995 to 2006, the Socio-Economic Program (SEP)
has disbursed some US$ 14.1 million, with more being
spent during the first
years when a large amount of infrastructure was built.
Current outlays exceed US$1 million a year (US$1.4 million in 2006).
Program costs are shared by the co-venturers in proportion
to their investment in the project.
The SEP budget is considerable compared to international
aid programs in Myanmar, although in fairness, many of these
programs have been cut back because of the country’s
political situation. It has been estimated that since the
mid-1990s, Myanmar has received around US$50 million a year
in bilateral and multilateral public development aid.
However, financial outlays are neither the only nor the
best way to judge the effectiveness of the SEP initiatives,
for several reasons:
 |
 |
 |
 |
- |
First, the performance indicators—target
population, declining mortality and illness, doubling
of school enrollment, increases in crop and animal production—speak
for themselves. |
 |
- |
In addition, success has been driven
by the very intense personal involvement of the
Socio-Economic
Program teams—and of Total E&P Myanmar
employees in general—and by the very positive
local response to the program, due in part to the
highly
decentralized management of the various projects
through the Village Communication Committees.. |
 |
- |
Lastly, the initiatives have been designed
not to create dependence but rather to produce sustainable
activities and behavior. |
Initially applied to 13 villages located near the
worksite, the program was extended to 12 additional villages since 2001.
Since then, it has been further widened, and today
a quarter of outpatients and nearly a quarter of in-patients
in the Kanbauk hospital and over one-third of boarding
students in the Kanbauk school, a quarter of outpatients
and nearly a quarter
of in-patients in the Kanbauk hospital come from villages
outside the pipeline region.
Total and its partners are committed to expanding
their socio-economic initiatives outside the pipeline
area. For
example, they support a national program to combat
blindness led by US-based Helen Keller International
Fundation and orphanages
that are home to 1,000 children in the Yangon region.
They are also examining other actions that would enable
even
more Myanmar inhabitants to enjoy the benefits of the
Yadana project. Such is the case with the public
health initiative in Myanmar designed to support and
treat people living with HIV/AIDS in the Mandalay region
which they joined in early 2005.
Obviously, the Yadana Socio-Economic Program alone cannot
resolve Myanmar’s problems, which are due both to
the political situation and to under-development, but the
presence of a company like Total can help get the country
moving in the right direction. |
|
| |
 |
|  10
- Have any third parties objectively and independently tested the quantitative claims of success made by your company with respect to the socio-economic program?
The number of external assessments of TEPM socio-economic program (SEP) is unusually high if compared to other development projects.
Since 2002, regular assessments of the SEP have been conducted by CDA (Collaborative for Development Action). For the purpose of these assessments, CDA conducted five site visits in October 2002, April 2003, December 2003, May 2005 and February 2008. The reports of these site visits are available on CDA’s web site.
In 2006, several external consultants were invited to make a comprehensive assessment of the SEP: the health program was assessed by a Public health specialist from International SOS, the economic development program was assessed by Pronatura, and the micro-finance program was assessed by the NGO Entrepreneurs du Monde.
For the micro-finance program, the NGO Entrepreneurs du Monde (EDM) is monitoring the program on a regular basis, with 2 to 3 site visits per year to audit the program and to build capacities of the micro-finance team. All data and statements are studied by EDM experts, and teams are taught about the proper way to handle them. However, here again the visits are not meant to check our quantitative records, but more generally to monitor objectives and achievements of the program. This is generally the way assessments are conducted in development agencies.
For the health program, TEPM has been using since 2008 a Public Health Consultant from Yangon University for external review and advice.
Most of those assessments are not testing quantitative data. In fact, testing of quantitative data of a program is extremely rare. Auditors normally focus on implementation of the activities, which does not mean that they do not rely on quantitative data.
However, our advisors have conducted quantitative data collection in a systematic way. For example, a health situation analysis was carried on in 2008. 291 households were visited and asked to answer a structured questionnaire composed of 55 questions. Stratified random sampling method was used to select the households, and the survey was conducted by the holder of an epidemiology degree in an American University. Together with his survey, he trained our medical doctors to record data in a systematic way.
It needs to be underlined that the SE program is also often visited by other third parties, such as:
 |
 |
 |
 |
- |
NGOs: in 2008, GRET and MENTOR came to Kanbauk to study Yadana SEP. In the past, other NGOs have visited Yadana SEP such as World vision, AMI, DRA, MSF Holland, AFXB, etc…. |
 |
- |
Diplomatic representatives : ambassadors from the US, UK, France, Italy and Germany visited the SEP |
 |
- |
Representatives from UN agencies (UN special rapporteur on Myanmar, ILO representative in Myanmar) |
 |
- |
Journalists (Washington Time, French and Belgium newspaper journalists…), |
 |
- |
Independent study group (Karen Christian Association), |
 |
- |
Government officials. |
|
|
| |
 |
|  11
- Is there any way to monitor how the revenues generated
by the Yadana project are used by the Myanmar government?
The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
(E.I.T.I.) is designed to monitor revenues. Launched
in 2002, approved at the G8 meeting in Evian in 2003
and implemented by a growing number of countries, the
E.I.T.I. aims to compare the total amount of revenues
paid to a State by extractive industries to the amounts
budgeted and spent.
As a partner in this initiative from the outset, Total
is determined to contribute to it by:
 |
 |
 |
 |
- |
Committing to a global process
involving all oil industry operators—host
countries, listed companies, independent companies
and state-owned companies. |
 |
- |
Reporting the amount of taxes
and royalties paid to host countries, insofar as
contracts allow, to a competent, recognized, independent
international organization. |
Our medium and long-term objective is to implement the
E.I.T.I. in Myanmar, even though the current political
situation is not conducive to this.
In addition to this necessary transparency, a multilateral
organization, such as the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) or the World Bank, would be the only organizations
with the legitimacy to assess how any State uses financial
resources generated when private companies pay taxes.
This role could not be assigned to a private company. |
|
| |
 |
|  14
- What would happen if Total were to withdraw from Myanmar?
If we decided to leave, we would immediately be replaced
by another company who might not apply the same social
or ethical standards. There would be no real impact
on the State’s revenues or on the political debate,
but there would certainly be a negative effect on its
people. As long as we believe our operations on the
Yadana project can contribute to the welfare of the
people of Myanmar, we are committed to staying in the
country and to demonstrating that our presence is more
beneficial for the Myanmar people than our absence
could be.
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
 |
|
|