The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Charter of the
International Labour Organization are fundamental benchmarks underpinning Total's Code of Conduct. Moreover,
the Group has always clearly maintained that it would not do business in a
country where it could not comply with its principles and ensure that its
subcontractors also observed them. Total has invested in Myanmar and continues
to operate the Yadana project because it believes that these requirements are
being met there. In the particular context of Myanmar, ensuring that these
conditions are met requires vigilance and commitment. From the outset,
therefore, Total has taken all the precautions that seemed necessary,
including:
 |
 |
 |
Defining a Code of Conduct drafted specially for the project, attached as an
integral part of the subcontractor agreements. |
 |
 |
 |
Applying very specific employment guidelines for salaried employees, including written
contracts, a physical examination, minimum wages and proportional employment
targets for neighboring villagers. |
 |
 |
 |
Establishing numerous communication channels with the villagers to ensure effective
information about the situation in the field and immediate intervention in case
of a problem between villagers and the Army. |
 |
 |
 |
Taking a very firm stance,
relayed by its local partner MOGE, against forced labor in the pipeline
region. |
From the moment that Total decided to operate in Myanmar, the Group
had to do so without compromising its principles, while effectively
ensuring that they
would be enforced. The results achieved through critical dialogue with
the government have created a region where economic development and
respect for
human rights coexist. Total has no doubt that the right choice was not
to refrain from involvement or to withdraw to preserve its reputation,
but to be
engaged and work for the welfare and protection of the population. The
experience gained in Myanmar has made Total more aware of the positive
impact it can have on social progress in the regions where it operates.
The same issue arises for many multinational corporations, in particular
those active in the extraction industries, because geological distribution of
resources often means that they operate in countries affected by strong
tensions. These tensions may be aggravated by the companies' presence because of
the wealth and envy that they generate. Engagement in such countries involves
taking a risk that could adversely affect corporate image. A responsible
multinational has to reconcile its contribution to economic development with the
progress of human rights where it operates, while refraining from interfering in
local politics.