In addition to commenting specifically on its field investigation, the CDA
made observations of a more general scope. While the organization acknowledges
that the Yadana project is making a very positive contribution to the quality of
life of communities in the pipeline region, it also asks Total to reflect more
closely on the consequences of its presence in Myanmar.
The CDA rules out disengagement, whose doubtful positive effects would
seem to be outweighed by the negative effects. While acknowledging that
it is not the role of a corporation to manage the politics of a host
country nor to
provide assistance incompatible with its economic objectives, the CDA
asks Total to consider what contribution it could make to the country's
development. In
particular, the CDA recommends:
 |
 |
|
More transparent, less defensive communication on Total's operations in
Myanmar, something that could also serve as a model for similar operations by
the Group in other areas of the world. |
|
|
|
More frequent contacts with civil society and NGOs. |
|
|
|
Broadening the topics of discussion with government authorities, with whom
contact must be maintained for the Group to take action. This would involve
reconciling the principle of non-interference incorporated in Total's Code of
Conduct with the Group's undoubted economic and social influence in the country.
A number of political issues, such as the application of laws banning forced
labor, have a direct impact on Total's operations and image. |
